All three of us agree with the argument Steven makes in the entry, that it would be a bad idea to vote for Nader in 2004, no matter what a person thought in 2000.
Bob Mould is on the same page as well:
POLITICAL MOMENT: The two major political parties in this country could hardly be further apart at this point in history. Voting for him is a waste of time. Campaigning for him is a waste of energy. Trying to convince me that he makes one bit of difference, in the world political landscape as it appears in 2004, is a waste of breath.I really can't fathom Nader's thought process on this one.
