Charlie Bertsch (cbertsch) wrote,
Charlie Bertsch

In Betweens

I'm thinking a lot about neglected territory these days. The space between a sexually intimate relationship and an ordinary friendship is one preoccupation, for example. It's in my work, however, that I'm pushing hardest to consider what gets left out. Social theory tends toward a level of generalization that prioritizes collective action over individual agency. That's the biggest problem with sociology and anthropology, historically, the fact that they do a better job of accounting for rules than exceptions. Certainly, it's why those who wish to fortify the will of actually existing individuals caution against ceding too much ground to those disciplines. Psychology, by contrast, typically does a better job with individuals, whether in theory or practice. But it is inclined towards crude over-simplification when applied to society as a whole, as even its most storied exponents demonstrate.

What is needed, yet all too often lacking, is a way of thinking about parts that are complex, but fall far short of constituting the sort of wholes that social theory posits. When Sigmund Freud tackled the idea of "group psychology," he may have had this goal in mind, but I find his collectives to be suspiciously similar to his conception of individuals. Sociologists and anthropologists show a similar failing, only coming from the opposite direction, writing of sub-categories that seem like their categories rewritten without a sense that in becoming "sub" they undergo qualitative as well as quantitative change. I don't think it should be that hard to conceive of groups that are distinct from both individuals and society as a whole. The challenge is to find a way of setting limits to our all-too-human impulse to convert the flesh of particularity into the air of abstraction.

This is where reflection on relationships proves handy. As is often the case, the way we live complexity is more complex than the way we think it. If we can manage to navigate our way through social networks in which the contrast between points of dense erotic and emotional investment and the diffuse cloud of acquaintance is richly textured, we should be able to conjure that in-between space conceptually through what social theorists, following Kant, term "rational reconstruction." That is, in describing what we already do, we have the potential to restrain our tendency to focus excessively, either on the individual or society as a whole. Perhaps musing on the practice of social networking in the New Media sense might help to advance this project along.
Tags: autobiography, sex, theory, topic_inbetween

  • Liminal, Libidinal

  • Redefining Need

    "Can a society which is incapable of protecting individual privacy even within one's four walls rightfully claim that it respects the individual and…

  • Mind Out of Joint

    These are strange and stressful times for all of us. But I feel simultaneously more prepared and less able to deal with this state of emergency.…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.