?

Log in

No account? Create an account
ENTRIES FRIENDS CALENDAR INFO PREVIOUS PREVIOUS NEXT NEXT
Off Target - De File — LiveJournal
Does Collecting Make You Feel Dirty?
cbertsch
cbertsch
Off Target
You may recall that I recently related Kim's decision to give in to the Target photo center employee's pressure and go with the "premium" One-Hour processing, because the employee in question said that Kodak was "just digital" and therefore inferior.

Well, the second batch of prints was cut so badly that there are black strips on the top or bottom.

But the worst of it is that the photo CDs -- I just looked at them for the first time -- are grainy and yellow for every roll. If the Kodak photo CD rates a 9 out of 10, the Target gets a 1 or 2 out of 10.

I'm so pissed off.

Remember, Kodak only, even if it takes longer, even if it's "just digital"!

Mode: enraged
Muse: Wu-Tang: 7th Chamber - Wu-Tang Clan - Enter The Wu-Tang (36 Chambers)

3 comments or Leave a comment
Comments
cpratt From: cpratt Date: October 25th, 2003 09:38 am (UTC) (LINK TO SPECIFIC ENTRY)
Better yet, check out the Fuji processing they have at Longs. It's way better than even the Kodak. Cheaper, too.
cbertsch From: cbertsch Date: October 25th, 2003 09:53 am (UTC) (LINK TO SPECIFIC ENTRY)

Fuji or Kodak

How are the photo CDs from Fuji at Long's? I was really disappointed with the JPEGs I got from Sam's Club, which also uses Fuji.

I know, I should just get a decent negative scanner.

But, in the short term, I still need old-school AND digital images from my processing.

Kodak's photo CDs have proved far better.
cpratt From: cpratt Date: October 25th, 2003 04:40 pm (UTC) (LINK TO SPECIFIC ENTRY)

Re: Fuji or Kodak

I don't know. When I got the film back, I opted instead to pick the images up at Fuji's Web site - this was cheaper than buying a CD.

Dan would probably know...
3 comments or Leave a comment